<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The (Comics) Journalistic Ideal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/</link>
	<description>Never Safe For Work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:07:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Gigcast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; webcomic Wire - 10/10/07</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/comment-page-1/#comment-14483</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gigcast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; webcomic Wire - 10/10/07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/#comment-14483</guid>
		<description>[...] Christopher Butcher posts about the state of comics journalism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christopher Butcher posts about the state of comics journalism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickey</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/comment-page-1/#comment-14472</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/#comment-14472</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking about the same issues, man. I found your link through the Beat and I absolutely agree with about how writerly hands can often be tied when it comes to coverage thanks to the dependence of PR and/or talent for a story and how a story&#039;s tone can have an effect on any future story.

It&#039;s a tough situation and a black hole when it comes to trying to find a working way around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about the same issues, man. I found your link through the Beat and I absolutely agree with about how writerly hands can often be tied when it comes to coverage thanks to the dependence of PR and/or talent for a story and how a story&#8217;s tone can have an effect on any future story.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tough situation and a black hole when it comes to trying to find a working way around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odessa steps magazine</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/comment-page-1/#comment-14396</link>
		<dc:creator>odessa steps magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/#comment-14396</guid>
		<description>First, let me thank you for saving me the trouble of buying TCJ for the first time in over five or six years.

Second, I think the best comics reporter possible is someone who understands the business but doesn&#039;t want to be part of it and isn&#039;t a fanboy/girl. It would be  a beat that they cover and that&#039;s it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let me thank you for saving me the trouble of buying TCJ for the first time in over five or six years.</p>
<p>Second, I think the best comics reporter possible is someone who understands the business but doesn&#8217;t want to be part of it and isn&#8217;t a fanboy/girl. It would be  a beat that they cover and that&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s called biting the hand that feeds you&#8230; &#171; Blurred Productions</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/comment-page-1/#comment-14361</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s called biting the hand that feeds you&#8230; &#171; Blurred Productions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/#comment-14361</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s called biting the hand that feeds&#160;you&#8230; October 9th, 2007 &#8212; Smith Michaels   This big announcement from Newsarama this week (really, last week) and this postat Blog@Newsarama (and the post it links to) got me thinking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s called biting the hand that feeds&nbsp;you&#8230; October 9th, 2007 &#8212; Smith Michaels   This big announcement from Newsarama this week (really, last week) and this postat Blog@Newsarama (and the post it links to) got me thinking. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markus</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/comment-page-1/#comment-14117</link>
		<dc:creator>markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/#comment-14117</guid>
		<description>I keep meaning to congratulate you and agree and leave it at that. But really, what I&#039;d be agreeing to is that journalists (in the broadest possible sense) should try harder, but that&#039;s awfully general and trivially true. Beyond that, I think the piece ultimately fails to address the problem of how to get people to pay for that and more &quot;proximately&quot; merely touches on the many _structural_ reasons why comics discourse is as. And as many of these have been chewed over at length already (IMO) a next step would have to be a systematic overview or an attempt at solving these problems which matches e.g. the attempt to make superbooks more female friendly in scope and dedication.
So, yay for the link and the reminder, but oddly enough it feels a bit like a step behind where we already are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep meaning to congratulate you and agree and leave it at that. But really, what I&#8217;d be agreeing to is that journalists (in the broadest possible sense) should try harder, but that&#8217;s awfully general and trivially true. Beyond that, I think the piece ultimately fails to address the problem of how to get people to pay for that and more &#8220;proximately&#8221; merely touches on the many _structural_ reasons why comics discourse is as. And as many of these have been chewed over at length already (IMO) a next step would have to be a systematic overview or an attempt at solving these problems which matches e.g. the attempt to make superbooks more female friendly in scope and dedication.<br />
So, yay for the link and the reminder, but oddly enough it feels a bit like a step behind where we already are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/comment-page-1/#comment-14076</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2007/10/06/the-comics-journalistic-ideal/#comment-14076</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you mentioned the Cooke interview.  I agree, it was a missed opportunity.  The interviewer asked a lot of questions answered in Cooke&#039;s work, &quot;what&#039;s your take on Character X,&quot; for example, and didn&#039;t probe any of the answers he received.  A bummer, since whatever you think of Cooke as a creator (and I&#039;m not a big fan), he has a unique vision and take on the industry that he hasn&#039;t been afraid to share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you mentioned the Cooke interview.  I agree, it was a missed opportunity.  The interviewer asked a lot of questions answered in Cooke&#8217;s work, &#8220;what&#8217;s your take on Character X,&#8221; for example, and didn&#8217;t probe any of the answers he received.  A bummer, since whatever you think of Cooke as a creator (and I&#8217;m not a big fan), he has a unique vision and take on the industry that he hasn&#8217;t been afraid to share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
