<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PiQ Issue #1: Post-Mortem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/</link>
	<description>Never Safe For Work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:26:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MangaBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PiQ magazine folds</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-72973</link>
		<dc:creator>MangaBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PiQ magazine folds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-72973</guid>
		<description>[...] While PiQ had come in for some heavy criticism during its short life, the message hints that the real reason for the magazine&#8217;s failure is a lack of support from parent company ADV. Perhaps &#8220;hints&#8221; is too weak a term. Itâ€™s unfortunate that weâ€™ll never get a chance to see how successful PiQ could have been, but a combination of low advertising revenue, poor business management and a lack of proper marketing and promotion all hamstrung the magazine from the start. We, the editorial/creative/production staff, did the best we could to put together a quality publication, but as weâ€™ve discovered, without a good financial backing, itâ€™s all an exercise in futility. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While PiQ had come in for some heavy criticism during its short life, the message hints that the real reason for the magazine&#8217;s failure is a lack of support from parent company ADV. Perhaps &#8220;hints&#8221; is too weak a term. Itâ€™s unfortunate that weâ€™ll never get a chance to see how successful PiQ could have been, but a combination of low advertising revenue, poor business management and a lack of proper marketing and promotion all hamstrung the magazine from the start. We, the editorial/creative/production staff, did the best we could to put together a quality publication, but as weâ€™ve discovered, without a good financial backing, itâ€™s all an exercise in futility. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog@Newsarama &#187; PiQ-y,. PiQ-y, PiQ-y</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-68289</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog@Newsarama &#187; PiQ-y,. PiQ-y, PiQ-y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-68289</guid>
		<description>[...] PiQ-y,. PiQ-y, PiQ-y  Tuesday March 18, 2008, 8:30 am   Chris Butcher goes over the debut issue of PiQ magazine, the replacement for Newtype, and doesn&#8217;t keep the kid gloves on for very long: Page 2: The letter from the editor is kind of awful. I hate it when marketers (and letâ€™s not kid ourselves, the people producing this magazine are marketers, selling popular culture and hoping to sell adspace to go along with it) try and tell me who I am: YOU HATE YOUR PARENTS! YOUTUBE! RETRO GAMING! TEAM FORTRESS 2! PLANETES! (really, Planetes?) According to the editor, â€œYouâ€™re not â€˜normalâ€™. Thatâ€™s why PiQ is entertaiment for the rest of us. Video games, movies, TV, anime, comicsâ€¦â€ Are youâ€¦ fâ€™ing kidding me? Video Games, Movies, TV? This is the way in which we are abnormal? And then the â€œEditor Guaranteeâ€, where he promises to never use â€œmade upâ€ words or to use language in an interesting wayâ€¦ Just what I was looking for, a boring, consumer-focussed way to express my individuality. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PiQ-y,. PiQ-y, PiQ-y  Tuesday March 18, 2008, 8:30 am   Chris Butcher goes over the debut issue of PiQ magazine, the replacement for Newtype, and doesn&#8217;t keep the kid gloves on for very long: Page 2: The letter from the editor is kind of awful. I hate it when marketers (and letâ€™s not kid ourselves, the people producing this magazine are marketers, selling popular culture and hoping to sell adspace to go along with it) try and tell me who I am: YOU HATE YOUR PARENTS! YOUTUBE! RETRO GAMING! TEAM FORTRESS 2! PLANETES! (really, Planetes?) According to the editor, â€œYouâ€™re not â€˜normalâ€™. Thatâ€™s why PiQ is entertaiment for the rest of us. Video games, movies, TV, anime, comicsâ€¦â€ Are youâ€¦ fâ€™ing kidding me? Video Games, Movies, TV? This is the way in which we are abnormal? And then the â€œEditor Guaranteeâ€, where he promises to never use â€œmade upâ€ words or to use language in an interesting wayâ€¦ Just what I was looking for, a boring, consumer-focussed way to express my individuality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. M.</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-63042</link>
		<dc:creator>S. M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-63042</guid>
		<description>Oh bawwwwwww.

Only weeaboo complain about PiQ. The honest truth is, Newtype started out this bad (Trust me, I have their Issue #0), and has been worse than this for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh bawwwwwww.</p>
<p>Only weeaboo complain about PiQ. The honest truth is, Newtype started out this bad (Trust me, I have their Issue #0), and has been worse than this for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Stimson</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-59610</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Stimson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-59610</guid>
		<description>I had been a subscriber to NewType USA since the third issue.  I looked forward to each new issue, especially since I was not as &quot;internet inclined&quot; as most anime/manga fans seem to be.
   The cancellation of NewType USA was originally brought to my attention as a tiny blurb on the last page of the final issue.  I didn&#039;t receive any letter until about a week before my new PiQ arrived in the mail. I was generally unhappy about this, but decided to give the new magazine a chance, fully expecting a &quot;rough&quot; new format.
  I agree with many of your points made about the magazine, but have one thing to add.  As a &quot;target demographic&quot;  for this magazine, I was offended by the dork, geek, nerd, and perv references used by the magazine. I understand that this type of &quot;self-hatred&quot; is supposed to be the &quot;in-thing&quot;, but this, along with the other factors written about in the review, makes me want to cancel my subscription.  But I will give the magazine one more chance in issue #2.  
   If you happen to review the second issue, I&#039;d love to read what you think has or has not been improved.  
  Thank you very much for you time and effort put into this review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been a subscriber to NewType USA since the third issue.  I looked forward to each new issue, especially since I was not as &#8220;internet inclined&#8221; as most anime/manga fans seem to be.<br />
   The cancellation of NewType USA was originally brought to my attention as a tiny blurb on the last page of the final issue.  I didn&#8217;t receive any letter until about a week before my new PiQ arrived in the mail. I was generally unhappy about this, but decided to give the new magazine a chance, fully expecting a &#8220;rough&#8221; new format.<br />
  I agree with many of your points made about the magazine, but have one thing to add.  As a &#8220;target demographic&#8221;  for this magazine, I was offended by the dork, geek, nerd, and perv references used by the magazine. I understand that this type of &#8220;self-hatred&#8221; is supposed to be the &#8220;in-thing&#8221;, but this, along with the other factors written about in the review, makes me want to cancel my subscription.  But I will give the magazine one more chance in issue #2.<br />
   If you happen to review the second issue, I&#8217;d love to read what you think has or has not been improved.<br />
  Thank you very much for you time and effort put into this review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cholin</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-59180</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cholin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-59180</guid>
		<description>As a long time NewTypeUSA reader(I&#039;ve been a subscriber since their premier issue) and what I&#039;ve seen of PiQ, I&#039;m not impressed. You&#039;ve pointed out in your review all the issues that I had with this magazine much better than I could have. I&#039;m right in the middle of the demographic that they are targeting, but they just don&#039;t focus enough on any one subject to keep me interested. I still had a year on my NewTypeUSA subscription and I hope that they improve but as of right now I&#039;m not going to renew/extend my subscription when it expires.

Thanks again for the great review. I&#039;ll be looking forward to your review of volume 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long time NewTypeUSA reader(I&#8217;ve been a subscriber since their premier issue) and what I&#8217;ve seen of PiQ, I&#8217;m not impressed. You&#8217;ve pointed out in your review all the issues that I had with this magazine much better than I could have. I&#8217;m right in the middle of the demographic that they are targeting, but they just don&#8217;t focus enough on any one subject to keep me interested. I still had a year on my NewTypeUSA subscription and I hope that they improve but as of right now I&#8217;m not going to renew/extend my subscription when it expires.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great review. I&#8217;ll be looking forward to your review of volume 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-58064</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-58064</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m late to the party here, but this is an awesome post-mortem. I know absolutely nothing about magazine design and layout, but I do know that your games, movies and manga should be kept in their own sections instead of scattered throughout. Ech.

I&#039;m not sure how I feel about PiQ&#039;s &quot;Hooray! Everyone&#039;s a winner!&quot; review style (especially since, as you pointed out, it&#039;s often hypocritical). I admit I&#039;m way too wussy to completely rip something apart and attack the author, but if something&#039;s just not entertaining me, I&#039;m not afraid to say it.

I think that&#039;s why I like this write-up so much. It&#039;s informative, it&#039;s fun to read, it says what needs to be said, but it refrains from the grade three schoolyard insults that anyone else would have resorted to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late to the party here, but this is an awesome post-mortem. I know absolutely nothing about magazine design and layout, but I do know that your games, movies and manga should be kept in their own sections instead of scattered throughout. Ech.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how I feel about PiQ&#8217;s &#8220;Hooray! Everyone&#8217;s a winner!&#8221; review style (especially since, as you pointed out, it&#8217;s often hypocritical). I admit I&#8217;m way too wussy to completely rip something apart and attack the author, but if something&#8217;s just not entertaining me, I&#8217;m not afraid to say it.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s why I like this write-up so much. It&#8217;s informative, it&#8217;s fun to read, it says what needs to be said, but it refrains from the grade three schoolyard insults that anyone else would have resorted to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferricide</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-55363</link>
		<dc:creator>ferricide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-55363</guid>
		<description>brutal! actually, extremely fair-minded -- it&#039;s just the mag that sounds brutal.

i&#039;m going to have to pick this up and blog my reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brutal! actually, extremely fair-minded &#8212; it&#8217;s just the mag that sounds brutal.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m going to have to pick this up and blog my reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew J. Brady</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-55023</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew J. Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-55023</guid>
		<description>Since nobody else has mentioned it, &quot;Leroy and Stitch&quot; is a DTV sequel to the &quot;Lilo and Stitch&quot; theatrical movie.  Now you know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since nobody else has mentioned it, &#8220;Leroy and Stitch&#8221; is a DTV sequel to the &#8220;Lilo and Stitch&#8221; theatrical movie.  Now you know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lianne Sentar</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-55016</link>
		<dc:creator>Lianne Sentar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-55016</guid>
		<description>These reviews are so much fun to read. God, remind me to never get on your bad side. Please don&#039;t ever read anything I worked on!

I think Newtype USA started up right around the time when the Internet could get you any otaku information you needed with relatively little fuss. I&#039;ve always thought a magazine for hardcore otaku seemed a little obsolete...hell, the reason anime as an industry is having TREMENDOUS financial problems is how technology savvy the fans are (downloading the cartoons and comics from the nets and whatnot). Unless you&#039;ve got really cool extras like DVDs or even weird, furoku-style goodies like they give away with manga magazines in Japan, I think your magazine is going to be largely redundant for a hardcore otaku, and will focus on plenty of genres s/he has no interest in (since manga has made us so genre-divided). I wish magazines like PiQ the best of luck, but I don&#039;t envy the workload they have in front of them. I have no idea where they should even start, and I worked for a print anime magazine for a year or two and was offered a full-time position as an editor for it that I just barely turned down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These reviews are so much fun to read. God, remind me to never get on your bad side. Please don&#8217;t ever read anything I worked on!</p>
<p>I think Newtype USA started up right around the time when the Internet could get you any otaku information you needed with relatively little fuss. I&#8217;ve always thought a magazine for hardcore otaku seemed a little obsolete&#8230;hell, the reason anime as an industry is having TREMENDOUS financial problems is how technology savvy the fans are (downloading the cartoons and comics from the nets and whatnot). Unless you&#8217;ve got really cool extras like DVDs or even weird, furoku-style goodies like they give away with manga magazines in Japan, I think your magazine is going to be largely redundant for a hardcore otaku, and will focus on plenty of genres s/he has no interest in (since manga has made us so genre-divided). I wish magazines like PiQ the best of luck, but I don&#8217;t envy the workload they have in front of them. I have no idea where they should even start, and I worked for a print anime magazine for a year or two and was offered a full-time position as an editor for it that I just barely turned down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jakala</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-55012</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jakala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-55012</guid>
		<description>I wonder, do magazines ever do usability studies like websites do?  I know I&#039;ve given up on several magazines in the past because they were a headache to try to get through due to &quot;edgy&quot; design choices that made the product unusable for actual readers, so I wonder if usability/readability is something magazine editors ever run past actual test subjects.  I know in IT the few times projects I worked on sprung for usability studies the results were really eye-opening.  All of us working on designing, coding, and testing the sites usually became too close to the product to spot the design issues that had crept in, or we had unconsciously adopted workarounds to get by the little annoyances that had become part of the site.  It was refreshing to get the perspective of outsiders with different levels of expertise when it came to web use.  Of course, there were times when a particular developer had become too wedded to his or her design to acknowledge the problems that others were reporting.  It sounds like that might be happening here with the PiQ staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder, do magazines ever do usability studies like websites do?  I know I&#8217;ve given up on several magazines in the past because they were a headache to try to get through due to &#8220;edgy&#8221; design choices that made the product unusable for actual readers, so I wonder if usability/readability is something magazine editors ever run past actual test subjects.  I know in IT the few times projects I worked on sprung for usability studies the results were really eye-opening.  All of us working on designing, coding, and testing the sites usually became too close to the product to spot the design issues that had crept in, or we had unconsciously adopted workarounds to get by the little annoyances that had become part of the site.  It was refreshing to get the perspective of outsiders with different levels of expertise when it came to web use.  Of course, there were times when a particular developer had become too wedded to his or her design to acknowledge the problems that others were reporting.  It sounds like that might be happening here with the PiQ staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-55010</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-55010</guid>
		<description>Chris-- kudos for taking the time to put together such an insanely thorough article and review. While I&#039;m a rabid consumer of (generally) manga/comics/movies/art, neither anime or figurines/toy are quite up my alley. That said, I&#039;m interested in magazine content in general as a way to communicate with readers, and appreciate your thoughts on PiQ. Since I was never a Newtype reader, and am not yet A PiQ reader, I took this as a one (smart) person&#039;s take on layout and design deconstruction, and in that regard it was very helpful.

I say this as we&#039;re working out the aesthetic and flow of the first issue of my zine Electric Ant, and I struggle to make it reach the level of design/layout majesty I know is possible :)  Just promise you won&#039;t do this degree of review on our issue #1.

ha ha, ryan!
http://electricantzine.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris&#8211; kudos for taking the time to put together such an insanely thorough article and review. While I&#8217;m a rabid consumer of (generally) manga/comics/movies/art, neither anime or figurines/toy are quite up my alley. That said, I&#8217;m interested in magazine content in general as a way to communicate with readers, and appreciate your thoughts on PiQ. Since I was never a Newtype reader, and am not yet A PiQ reader, I took this as a one (smart) person&#8217;s take on layout and design deconstruction, and in that regard it was very helpful.</p>
<p>I say this as we&#8217;re working out the aesthetic and flow of the first issue of my zine Electric Ant, and I struggle to make it reach the level of design/layout majesty I know is possible :)  Just promise you won&#8217;t do this degree of review on our issue #1.</p>
<p>ha ha, ryan!<br />
<a href="http://electricantzine.com" rel="nofollow">http://electricantzine.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Milone</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-55008</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Milone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-55008</guid>
		<description>Good article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Stewart</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54998</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54998</guid>
		<description>... I didnâ€™t want to get into the generational fandom thing (itâ€™s totally going to blow up in the next year) but PiQ has literally nothing to say to you, and thatâ€™s kind of embarrassing...

Could you expand on this a little? Not here and now, nessicarily, but sometime? It sounds fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; I didnâ€™t want to get into the generational fandom thing (itâ€™s totally going to blow up in the next year) but PiQ has literally nothing to say to you, and thatâ€™s kind of embarrassing&#8230;</p>
<p>Could you expand on this a little? Not here and now, nessicarily, but sometime? It sounds fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave merrill</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54983</link>
		<dc:creator>dave merrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54983</guid>
		<description>As soon as we get all our junk out of boxes, you guyses are coming over!!!

I have pretty myopic, insular tastes, so I really don&#039;t have high expectations for any magazine, at least not in terms of pushing my buttons. Then again, I&#039;m out of the 18-34 demographic, so my likes and dislikes are of zero interest to the Powers That Be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as we get all our junk out of boxes, you guyses are coming over!!!</p>
<p>I have pretty myopic, insular tastes, so I really don&#8217;t have high expectations for any magazine, at least not in terms of pushing my buttons. Then again, I&#8217;m out of the 18-34 demographic, so my likes and dislikes are of zero interest to the Powers That Be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54974</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54974</guid>
		<description>Scott- I can take you at your word, of course, but it really jumped out at me when I was reading it, and I won&#039;t be the only one reading it and feeling that way.

As for issue #1 not being confusing... I&#039;ve laid out my case pretty well. I don&#039;t think I was unfair. If you don&#039;t think the criticism is all that applicable then feel free to ignore it.

I really don&#039;t have an axe to grind with you guys... I appreciate that you&#039;re getting a lot of shit right now from pissed off fanboys and girls and that&#039;s probably clouding your reaction here. I didn&#039;t really follow Newtype that closely, I don&#039;t buy very much anime, and I&#039;m not generally participating in that fandom. I&#039;m a retailer who sells many of the items you feature in your magazine, who likes magazines and writing, and I decided to check this one out and see what it was all about. It&#039;s not good, Scott. Either on its own merits or in comparison to the polished, professional, and consistent magazine that you used to publish. I&#039;ve just done 6500 words of free consulting for you, it&#039;s in your best interests to pay attention to it.

Seriously though: Good Luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott- I can take you at your word, of course, but it really jumped out at me when I was reading it, and I won&#8217;t be the only one reading it and feeling that way.</p>
<p>As for issue #1 not being confusing&#8230; I&#8217;ve laid out my case pretty well. I don&#8217;t think I was unfair. If you don&#8217;t think the criticism is all that applicable then feel free to ignore it.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t have an axe to grind with you guys&#8230; I appreciate that you&#8217;re getting a lot of shit right now from pissed off fanboys and girls and that&#8217;s probably clouding your reaction here. I didn&#8217;t really follow Newtype that closely, I don&#8217;t buy very much anime, and I&#8217;m not generally participating in that fandom. I&#8217;m a retailer who sells many of the items you feature in your magazine, who likes magazines and writing, and I decided to check this one out and see what it was all about. It&#8217;s not good, Scott. Either on its own merits or in comparison to the polished, professional, and consistent magazine that you used to publish. I&#8217;ve just done 6500 words of free consulting for you, it&#8217;s in your best interests to pay attention to it.</p>
<p>Seriously though: Good Luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54957</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54957</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I don&#039;t really think it&#039;s appropriate for me to engage in a back and forth with you as a spokesman for PiQ, but I want to address a couple of things you just said.

First off, let me again say that you are completely incorrect in writing that a few words &quot;tell you quite clearly what the editorial staff thinks of its readership.&quot; This is why I responded to your post in the first place. When put in context these words are very clearly intended as good natured ribbing and couldn&#039;t be any less mean-spirited. We have enormous respect for our readers and devote every day to making a magazine that they will enjoy.

Obviously fine tuning is needed as this is a brand new magazine, but I don&#039;t think issue #1 is anywhere near as confusing or strange as you have presented it here. It&#039;s pretty obvious what we&#039;re shooting for: that people who are interested in anime/comics/movies/games will pick it up and be exposed to content they wouldn&#039;t have been exposed to otherwise. The approach of the magazine reflects that, with anime features next to comics features and so on. We don&#039;t want games people to just flip to the games section or DVD collectors to just flip to the DVD reviews. I understand that some people want a very rigidly structured magazine as Newtype was, and there are plenty of those out there, but that&#039;s not what we&#039;re interested in making at this point. Some may regard this as disorganized or &quot;schizophrenic,&quot; but we&#039;re trying a different approach.

And judging from the emails and subscriptions we&#039;ve received since the magazine hit stands late last week, it has worked. We&#039;ve gotten emails from anime people who were now interested in the comics we covered even though they haven&#039;t read a comic book in years. We&#039;ve gotten emails from sci-fi people who now want to check out anime, a genre that seemed daunting to them before. These people get what we&#039;re trying to do, and we couldn&#039;t be happier.

And I sincerely hope everyone who doesn&#039;t like PiQ now can look at it with fresh eyes in the coming months. We&#039;re very proud of what we&#039;ve made and hope we can make it even better as time goes on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really think it&#8217;s appropriate for me to engage in a back and forth with you as a spokesman for PiQ, but I want to address a couple of things you just said.</p>
<p>First off, let me again say that you are completely incorrect in writing that a few words &#8220;tell you quite clearly what the editorial staff thinks of its readership.&#8221; This is why I responded to your post in the first place. When put in context these words are very clearly intended as good natured ribbing and couldn&#8217;t be any less mean-spirited. We have enormous respect for our readers and devote every day to making a magazine that they will enjoy.</p>
<p>Obviously fine tuning is needed as this is a brand new magazine, but I don&#8217;t think issue #1 is anywhere near as confusing or strange as you have presented it here. It&#8217;s pretty obvious what we&#8217;re shooting for: that people who are interested in anime/comics/movies/games will pick it up and be exposed to content they wouldn&#8217;t have been exposed to otherwise. The approach of the magazine reflects that, with anime features next to comics features and so on. We don&#8217;t want games people to just flip to the games section or DVD collectors to just flip to the DVD reviews. I understand that some people want a very rigidly structured magazine as Newtype was, and there are plenty of those out there, but that&#8217;s not what we&#8217;re interested in making at this point. Some may regard this as disorganized or &#8220;schizophrenic,&#8221; but we&#8217;re trying a different approach.</p>
<p>And judging from the emails and subscriptions we&#8217;ve received since the magazine hit stands late last week, it has worked. We&#8217;ve gotten emails from anime people who were now interested in the comics we covered even though they haven&#8217;t read a comic book in years. We&#8217;ve gotten emails from sci-fi people who now want to check out anime, a genre that seemed daunting to them before. These people get what we&#8217;re trying to do, and we couldn&#8217;t be happier.</p>
<p>And I sincerely hope everyone who doesn&#8217;t like PiQ now can look at it with fresh eyes in the coming months. We&#8217;re very proud of what we&#8217;ve made and hope we can make it even better as time goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54933</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54933</guid>
		<description>Got linked to this from Newsarama. It&#039;s a good and thorough review. I just bought both the first PiQ and the last Newtype this weekend, and having only flipped through PiQ so far, I can say it really does seem to lack organization, making the flow of reading a bit bumpy.

While this isn&#039;t really supposed to be a Newtype replacement (aside from it actually replacing Newtype in both subscriptions and in release schedule), I fear that it won&#039;t have enough of the content that drew fans to Newtype in the first place  in order to keep them now. Considering that a large part of their readership is former Newtype readers, not giving them what attracted them in the first place while almost blindly throwing an assortment of articles together does seem like it would alienate them, intended or not. I know it&#039;s missing the stuff I liked about Newtype and didn&#039;t really have anything that interested me that wasn&#039;t anime related (like the Is Anime Dead article), despite my varied interests in the subjects they want to cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got linked to this from Newsarama. It&#8217;s a good and thorough review. I just bought both the first PiQ and the last Newtype this weekend, and having only flipped through PiQ so far, I can say it really does seem to lack organization, making the flow of reading a bit bumpy.</p>
<p>While this isn&#8217;t really supposed to be a Newtype replacement (aside from it actually replacing Newtype in both subscriptions and in release schedule), I fear that it won&#8217;t have enough of the content that drew fans to Newtype in the first place  in order to keep them now. Considering that a large part of their readership is former Newtype readers, not giving them what attracted them in the first place while almost blindly throwing an assortment of articles together does seem like it would alienate them, intended or not. I know it&#8217;s missing the stuff I liked about Newtype and didn&#8217;t really have anything that interested me that wasn&#8217;t anime related (like the Is Anime Dead article), despite my varied interests in the subjects they want to cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MangaBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Please come to Boston in the springtime&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54911</link>
		<dc:creator>MangaBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Please come to Boston in the springtime&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54911</guid>
		<description>[...] At Comics212, Christopher Butcher dissects the first issue of PiQ. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At Comics212, Christopher Butcher dissects the first issue of PiQ. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retro</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54872</link>
		<dc:creator>Retro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54872</guid>
		<description>Thank you Chris,

Yes I know my Japanese is atrocious. :)

Here it is;

[quote] &quot;Dear NewType USA reader,

By now many of your are aware that NewTypeUSA published its final issue in February 2008. Although many of us will miss that magazine-including me-I couldn&#039;t be more thrilled to announce a new publication that will surely be everything from NewTypeUSA...and much more!

With many of the same creative staff from NewTypeUSA, PiQ Magazine will fulfill your anime wants and needs, while also delivering the most cutting edge content in all areas of entertainment.  From video games to movies, music to manga, comics to TV, DVDs, and more, PiQ will live up to its bold mandate: &quot;Entertainment for the rest of us.&quot;

And here&#039;s the best news! The fine folks at PiQ.LLC want to give you double the value for you[r] remaining subscription, but you&#039;ll also receive two issues for every remaining NewTypeUSA you&#039;re owed.  Double the number of magazines, and you don&#039;t have to do a thing to take advantage of it!

So enjoy the first issue, and rest assured that you&#039;ll continue to receive the best coverage of all aspects of entertainment delivered straight to your door.  And don&#039;t hesitate to let us know what you think.  Drop us a line at letters@piqmag.com, and tell us what you want to see covered in these pages.

Be sure to tell your friends about PiQ, because we&#039;re positive they&#039;ll love it as much as we enjoy producing it.  And stay tuned to www.piqmag.com for our exciting web offerings!

Gary Steinman
Publisher&quot; [/quote] 

P.S.: What is with this comment on the bottom right hand side of page 6 of PiQ under their contact information?
&quot;Created in the great city of Houston, where I only shot two or three people on the way to work today.&quot;

Is that supposed to be funny? Considering all the school shootings in the past few years its actually insensitive and crude at best. Not very professional at all IMHO.
But maybe that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Chris,</p>
<p>Yes I know my Japanese is atrocious. :)</p>
<p>Here it is;</p>
<p>[quote] &#8220;Dear NewType USA reader,</p>
<p>By now many of your are aware that NewTypeUSA published its final issue in February 2008. Although many of us will miss that magazine-including me-I couldn&#8217;t be more thrilled to announce a new publication that will surely be everything from NewTypeUSA&#8230;and much more!</p>
<p>With many of the same creative staff from NewTypeUSA, PiQ Magazine will fulfill your anime wants and needs, while also delivering the most cutting edge content in all areas of entertainment.  From video games to movies, music to manga, comics to TV, DVDs, and more, PiQ will live up to its bold mandate: &#8220;Entertainment for the rest of us.&#8221;</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s the best news! The fine folks at PiQ.LLC want to give you double the value for you[r] remaining subscription, but you&#8217;ll also receive two issues for every remaining NewTypeUSA you&#8217;re owed.  Double the number of magazines, and you don&#8217;t have to do a thing to take advantage of it!</p>
<p>So enjoy the first issue, and rest assured that you&#8217;ll continue to receive the best coverage of all aspects of entertainment delivered straight to your door.  And don&#8217;t hesitate to let us know what you think.  Drop us a line at <a href="mailto:letters@piqmag.com">letters@piqmag.com</a>, and tell us what you want to see covered in these pages.</p>
<p>Be sure to tell your friends about PiQ, because we&#8217;re positive they&#8217;ll love it as much as we enjoy producing it.  And stay tuned to <a href="http://www.piqmag.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.piqmag.com</a> for our exciting web offerings!</p>
<p>Gary Steinman<br />
Publisher&#8221; [/quote] </p>
<p>P.S.: What is with this comment on the bottom right hand side of page 6 of PiQ under their contact information?<br />
&#8220;Created in the great city of Houston, where I only shot two or three people on the way to work today.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that supposed to be funny? Considering all the school shootings in the past few years its actually insensitive and crude at best. Not very professional at all IMHO.<br />
But maybe that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54836</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54836</guid>
		<description>Scott: Thanks for commenting. I&#039;m honestly not sure if you&#039;re interested in a back-and-forth here, but regardless of what you&#039;re saying here on my blog, the magazine itself felt very unfriendly to you previous customers at numerous points throughout its articles. The slams on Moe culture in particular were the big indicators, but honestly, who subscribing to Newtype is going to be that into this new magazine? It offers almost nothing to the hardcore otaku. That in particular is not a failing on its own merits, but when the editorial staff and publishing arm is working hard to promote a connection between the two magazines (a connection you don&#039;t seem to want), you can&#039;t help but fail. This also leads into the second point you make: you fail on your own merits and regardless of comparison to Newtype, and I&#039;ve tried to outline that as clearly as possible.... but PiQ is never given a chance to stand on its own two feet. You have... soooooooo much work to do. I&#039;ve spent 6500+ words detailing the successes and failures of this magazine, and to be honest, I could probably spend another 2 or 3 thousand words just talking you through where you went wrong _conceptually_.Â  You&#039;re the arm of a multi-million-dollar company with incredible resources... This first issue just didn&#039;t come together... 3 or 4 good articles doesn&#039;t excuse the rest of what saw print, and that has nothing to do with a comparison to NEWTYPE, but basic things like flow, design, and content. I think that, even now, I endeavoured to judge you on your merits rather than by comparison, but you just didn&#039;t stack up, and a variety of basic and conceptual mistakes just did you in.
Derek- N/P. Thanks again for letting me interview you.

Dave- Old school otaku like yourself should be the most upset about this. I didn&#039;t want to get into the generational fandom thing (it&#039;s totally going to blow up in the next year) but PiQ has literally nothing to say to you, and that&#039;s kind of embarrassing. As for coming by the store? Whatev. I love you guys whenever you drop in. Though I&#039;d love it if you guys would invite Andrew and I for a housewarming at some point so we can bring you a house plant...

Retro- Dude, your romanji is awful. Domo Arigato Gozaimasu! Train Harder! That said, glad you liked the piece, I kind of figured you would :). I think that your complaints at Johanna&#039;s blog really are legitimate, and it&#039;s important to find satisfaction for yourself and others who feel they have a legitimate grievance following the cancellation of Newtype, particularly as ADV has not declared any sort of bankruptcy. If you&#039;re unhappy, work to rectify the situation, and more power to you.

Also, I did not see the Newtype subscriber letter, but I feel like I know what it says based on complaints I&#039;ve seen elsewhere. Feel free to print it here.

Amy: Thanks. Glad you liked it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott: Thanks for commenting. I&#8217;m honestly not sure if you&#8217;re interested in a back-and-forth here, but regardless of what you&#8217;re saying here on my blog, the magazine itself felt very unfriendly to you previous customers at numerous points throughout its articles. The slams on Moe culture in particular were the big indicators, but honestly, who subscribing to Newtype is going to be that into this new magazine? It offers almost nothing to the hardcore otaku. That in particular is not a failing on its own merits, but when the editorial staff and publishing arm is working hard to promote a connection between the two magazines (a connection you don&#8217;t seem to want), you can&#8217;t help but fail. This also leads into the second point you make: you fail on your own merits and regardless of comparison to Newtype, and I&#8217;ve tried to outline that as clearly as possible&#8230;. but PiQ is never given a chance to stand on its own two feet. You have&#8230; soooooooo much work to do. I&#8217;ve spent 6500+ words detailing the successes and failures of this magazine, and to be honest, I could probably spend another 2 or 3 thousand words just talking you through where you went wrong _conceptually_.Â  You&#8217;re the arm of a multi-million-dollar company with incredible resources&#8230; This first issue just didn&#8217;t come together&#8230; 3 or 4 good articles doesn&#8217;t excuse the rest of what saw print, and that has nothing to do with a comparison to NEWTYPE, but basic things like flow, design, and content. I think that, even now, I endeavoured to judge you on your merits rather than by comparison, but you just didn&#8217;t stack up, and a variety of basic and conceptual mistakes just did you in.<br />
Derek- N/P. Thanks again for letting me interview you.</p>
<p>Dave- Old school otaku like yourself should be the most upset about this. I didn&#8217;t want to get into the generational fandom thing (it&#8217;s totally going to blow up in the next year) but PiQ has literally nothing to say to you, and that&#8217;s kind of embarrassing. As for coming by the store? Whatev. I love you guys whenever you drop in. Though I&#8217;d love it if you guys would invite Andrew and I for a housewarming at some point so we can bring you a house plant&#8230;</p>
<p>Retro- Dude, your romanji is awful. Domo Arigato Gozaimasu! Train Harder! That said, glad you liked the piece, I kind of figured you would :). I think that your complaints at Johanna&#8217;s blog really are legitimate, and it&#8217;s important to find satisfaction for yourself and others who feel they have a legitimate grievance following the cancellation of Newtype, particularly as ADV has not declared any sort of bankruptcy. If you&#8217;re unhappy, work to rectify the situation, and more power to you.</p>
<p>Also, I did not see the Newtype subscriber letter, but I feel like I know what it says based on complaints I&#8217;ve seen elsewhere. Feel free to print it here.</p>
<p>Amy: Thanks. Glad you liked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54828</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54828</guid>
		<description>Loved this article.  Thank you for taking the time to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this article.  Thank you for taking the time to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retro</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54756</link>
		<dc:creator>Retro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54756</guid>
		<description>Whoops,
I should have clarified that this letter was only sent to former NTUSA subscribers.

My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops,<br />
I should have clarified that this letter was only sent to former NTUSA subscribers.</p>
<p>My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retro</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54754</link>
		<dc:creator>Retro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54754</guid>
		<description>Chris I have a question;

Have you seen the letter from Gary Steinman that was inside the front cover (inbetween the Battlestar Galactica advertisement).  It reads &quot;Dear NewType USA reader...&quot;

If you haven&#039;t seen it, would you like too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris I have a question;</p>
<p>Have you seen the letter from Gary Steinman that was inside the front cover (inbetween the Battlestar Galactica advertisement).  It reads &#8220;Dear NewType USA reader&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen it, would you like too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave merrill</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54748</link>
		<dc:creator>dave merrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54748</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a really thorough and impressive review, and now I can speak authoritatively about the magazine without ever having to read it!  Thanks!

I do hate that attitude of &quot;Wow, us crazy nerds who like these weird strange SF movies and TV shows, we&#039;re so out there!&quot;  Guys, it&#039;s called popular culture for a reason.  

Sorry we haven&#039;t been in to bug you and buy stuff lately, if we&#039;re not unpacking boxes we&#039;re working like crazy or buying more shelves at Ikea. I&#039;m way behind on my comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really thorough and impressive review, and now I can speak authoritatively about the magazine without ever having to read it!  Thanks!</p>
<p>I do hate that attitude of &#8220;Wow, us crazy nerds who like these weird strange SF movies and TV shows, we&#8217;re so out there!&#8221;  Guys, it&#8217;s called popular culture for a reason.  </p>
<p>Sorry we haven&#8217;t been in to bug you and buy stuff lately, if we&#8217;re not unpacking boxes we&#8217;re working like crazy or buying more shelves at Ikea. I&#8217;m way behind on my comics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retro</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54747</link>
		<dc:creator>Retro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54747</guid>
		<description>Chris,
all I can say is &quot;Dommo Aringato Gosaimasu&quot; (Thank you very much!)

I loved the article. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
all I can say is &#8220;Dommo Aringato Gosaimasu&#8221; (Thank you very much!)</p>
<p>I loved the article. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Halliday</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54738</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Halliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54738</guid>
		<description>Glad I could help.

After reading this, I&#039;m totally glad I went with my initial opinion and didn&#039;t actually buy the magazine... one of the things I liked about NEWTYPE is that, on the occassions that I did buy it, I could at least count on it to be filled with art or interesting photos I could use as reference... I found PiQ to be surprisingly bare visually... there wasn&#039;t much to look at.

It really bothered me that they didn&#039;t segregate their content... it was almost epileptic.

I will at least LOOK at the second issue, but, yeah, they&#039;d have to really get their shit together to get me to actually buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I could help.</p>
<p>After reading this, I&#8217;m totally glad I went with my initial opinion and didn&#8217;t actually buy the magazine&#8230; one of the things I liked about NEWTYPE is that, on the occassions that I did buy it, I could at least count on it to be filled with art or interesting photos I could use as reference&#8230; I found PiQ to be surprisingly bare visually&#8230; there wasn&#8217;t much to look at.</p>
<p>It really bothered me that they didn&#8217;t segregate their content&#8230; it was almost epileptic.</p>
<p>I will at least LOOK at the second issue, but, yeah, they&#8217;d have to really get their shit together to get me to actually buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54737</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54737</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris!

This is Scott of PiQ. I&#039;m sorry you didn&#039;t enjoy the first issue, but hopefully we can win you over in the coming months. I did want to comment on 2 things though that have come up repeatedly.

1) We have the utmost respect for anyone who would pick up our magazine and those who think otherwise are deeply mistaken. In planning and creating PiQ we made a very conscious decision to stay away from the snarky, bullying tone of most entertainment media nowadays, and every piece we write and edit keeps this in mind from beginning to end.

2) I understand that you probably wouldn&#039;t like the first issue of PiQ whether or not Newtype USA ever existed, but I hope that over time we can overcome comparisons to it. Newtype wasn&#039;t something that we had a whole lot of freedom in creating; it was the American version of a Japanese magazine. PiQ is completely ours from start to finish, a fact that enables the staff and contributors to insert more of their own personalities and ideas into their work. We&#039;re trying very hard to make something brand new from scratch, and I hope we can be judged on our own merits as time goes on.

Thanks for giving us your attention, and I hope future issues are more to your liking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris!</p>
<p>This is Scott of PiQ. I&#8217;m sorry you didn&#8217;t enjoy the first issue, but hopefully we can win you over in the coming months. I did want to comment on 2 things though that have come up repeatedly.</p>
<p>1) We have the utmost respect for anyone who would pick up our magazine and those who think otherwise are deeply mistaken. In planning and creating PiQ we made a very conscious decision to stay away from the snarky, bullying tone of most entertainment media nowadays, and every piece we write and edit keeps this in mind from beginning to end.</p>
<p>2) I understand that you probably wouldn&#8217;t like the first issue of PiQ whether or not Newtype USA ever existed, but I hope that over time we can overcome comparisons to it. Newtype wasn&#8217;t something that we had a whole lot of freedom in creating; it was the American version of a Japanese magazine. PiQ is completely ours from start to finish, a fact that enables the staff and contributors to insert more of their own personalities and ideas into their work. We&#8217;re trying very hard to make something brand new from scratch, and I hope we can be judged on our own merits as time goes on.</p>
<p>Thanks for giving us your attention, and I hope future issues are more to your liking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54730</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54730</guid>
		<description>Tim- My memory of Comic Foundry #1 is hazy, apparently. APOLOGIES.

;)

- Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim- My memory of Comic Foundry #1 is hazy, apparently. APOLOGIES.</p>
<p>;)</p>
<p>- Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Leong</title>
		<link>http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-54729</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Leong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comics212.net/2008/03/17/piq-issue-1-post-mortem/#comment-54729</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I flipped through it the other day but I&#039;m not familiar enough with NewType USA to provide adequate context in a review. I will note that despite your keen eye, however, I&#039;ve actually never used ITC Officina in any publication I&#039;ve ever worked for. Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I flipped through it the other day but I&#8217;m not familiar enough with NewType USA to provide adequate context in a review. I will note that despite your keen eye, however, I&#8217;ve actually never used ITC Officina in any publication I&#8217;ve ever worked for. Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
