Bad Book Design: Bandai takes top honours

ranma_spine_design

Sooooo…. I know that manga fans can be a little “finnicky” when it comes to the condition and design of their books. They want the sizes to match between editions. I appreciate that… I know a bunch of folks were caught way, way off-guard when Viz did a line-wide switch of the size and design of their books a few years ago, to keep up with Tokyopop. Heh, poor bastards, collecting Rumiko Takahashi’s Ranma 1/2 for 10 years, only to have the last 20 volumes show up in a new format… But it doesn’t stop there! So Viz switched from the big-size to the Tokyopop size, then they changed their corporate logo from the old downward-pointing-triangle VIZ logo to the new (current) VIZ MEDIA logo on the spine of all of their books… 6 volumes before the end of their release of Ranma 1/2, making it almost impossible to have a complete set of Ranma 1/2 with the same spine designs. The best though is that, since then, they’ve changed the spine design AGAIN removing the old “action” logo and replacing it with their new stylized ‘V’, but so far as I can tell not every volume is available with the same spine design, because of the differences between printings.

If you’ve got even a little bit of the old OCD, that’s gotta be killing you. If I didn’t think Viz were above such things, I’d ALMOST think they were doing it on purpose, just to make their readers crazy. Actually, the way in which that drives people crazy is one of my secret favourite things in comics…

But that’s a 36 volume series, released over 15 or 16 years. We’ll… we’ll cut them a little bit of slack. But seriously, what’s Bandai’s excuse for changing the design of a current series they’re releasing with almost every volume?

codegeass_spines_1000px

So this is the CODE GEASS series of manga, based on the popular anime series. It features designs by CLAMP!, it’s pretty popular, you know? I bet it was a coup for Bandai to get this series. And what do they do with it? Well, geezus, look at it. Out of 8 books there, only 3 of them have the same trade dress. Code Geass: Suzuku changes entirely between volume 1 and 2. Code Geass: Lelouch actually matches up for 1 and 2, but the entire design changes for volume 3, including the logo for the book itself! The next two books are the novels, and they don’t keep a consistent trade dress with the line, or even with each other. I mean, things can be “off” in the design stage, but look at the way the Bandai logos (almost) match up but the STAGE x graphics don’t… The designer is just totally asleep at the wheel. Then we get the next manga, which is (I believe) the most recent in the series: Code Geass: Nunnally. It has a different logo treatment again, and the volume number is now IN the logo, rather than in it’s own graphic or matching up with anything. And the spine text is a different treatment too.

These books have been released monthly since October 2008. Either the designer is getting fired after every book and destroying all of his files and stealing all of the reference copies each time, or this is the single most unprofessional design and editorial team in manga.

But wait, it gets better. Let’s check out another Bandai release: Eureka 7.

eureka7_spines_1000px

No digital trickery here. This is actually the vooks in order. Volume 1 is clearly labeled volume one. Then volume 2 has a completely different spine design, and NO VOLUME NUMBER. I promise you, that is actually volume 2, we didn’t just grab like a random novel or something and slide it in there. Here, I’ll show you:

eureka7_vol2_600pxAt least they thought enough to, you know, put the volume number on the front of the book, even if it’s not on the spine. But that’s pretty powerfully stupid. But the best part?

Scroll back up to the previous picture. At the end of the volume 1-6, there’s a second series, “Eureka Seven: Gravity Boys and Lifting Girl”. It’s got a tiny little subtitle, but it’s there, and a clearly-placed “Vol. 1” And then right next to it? Why, that’s Eureka Seven: Gravity Boys and Lifting Girl Volume 2, except it’s missing the subtitle, making it look exactly the same as the regular series. 

eureka7_vol2_s2_600px

It’s really the second series volume 2, but because the first series volume 2 is fucked up AND this one is fucked up, this one looks like the first series volume 2… Which creates no end of problems for people looking for it on the shelf, or in the overstock. Again, these books are coming out more-or-less monthly, which means it’s really just a total lack of interest… and quality control… on the part of the folks at Bandai. They’re a major international publishing company working in a variety of media. This is kind of embarassing?

This was brought to my attention by Parrish, today, as he sighed drammatically about how fucked up this is. So I decided to blog his misery! Attention employees: your sadness is fodder for my blog. Thanks!

– Christopher

17 Replies to “Bad Book Design: Bandai takes top honours”

  1. I can be a bit OCD with my books, but I never really felt a big problem with Viz’s change in format or design. Number 1 reason? The price also went down about 5-8 dollars. Heck Viz, chop off another inch or so and lower the price another $5! I’ll take it. As for that Bandai stuff, I don’t really think of their change as much as a “design choice” as a lack of quality control.

  2. Yeah, that’s fairly wince-inducing. Hm…

    So, just how OCD are people about this kind of thing? Enough that if, say, a competent designer created stick-on spines with a unified design, people would actually peel them off and carefully “fix” each book?

    I wonder…

  3. I don’t collect manga, but I can appreciate the point since I have other book collections. Collections just look better on the shelf when their book spines match. At least have the individual books in a series match!

  4. The Viz resize really drove me crazy with Utena, they only had to more volumes in the series to finish when they switched over. It would have been nice to have been able to get the last two in the same size then have them do the reprint.

  5. Put me in the OCD category. Those are terrible. I do better stuff when I’m, um archiving old video material. It’s actually more work to change stuff like that. Here is your template, change the number, change the picture, knock off work early and go for drinks. DUH!

  6. As a designer, seeing those haphazard spines sends me into apoplexy. I don’t know how the designer, when handing the designs to the publisher, got away without having his ass reamed.

    It makes me think that Bandai either doesn’t care about its customers or the books’ brand or both.

  7. Oh. My. God.

    And I thought the spines on my Azumanga Daioh books were bad. But they’re nothing compared to the Bandai trainwrecks.

  8. It annoys me so much! I hope they don’t keep the random spine-age for the Lucky Star volumes >__<.

    Dark Horse are one of the few publishers in my collection who seem to nail a perfectly aligned spine for each series every time!

  9. I noticed that too…the way they changed the size of the Tokyopop and Viz logos on the spines drives me nuts. For me, I could care less about the publisher than about the actual alignment of the relevant stuff on the spine (logo, image, etc.). It just looks bad when the lettering changes, and it’s harder to find stuff fast when they’re all not aligned properly. It’s like getting the “kid’s” version of Harry Potter and then suddenly getting the “adult” version after the first half. Same content, but…

    And when they design the cover to make the volume number hard to find, that’s annoying too.

  10. I actually didn’t mind Viz’s changes in the spines. I make sure to get the first printing of each, knowing that’s what the spine looked like when I first bought it, and that’s good enough for me. That’s what I had to do with the old Sailor Moon books since they change the spines so much as it passed to different companies and names.

  11. Just as a point of clarification, fellow-employee Parrish was more exasperated-angry at this stupidity than exasperated-sad. I’m sorry I mischaracterized your rage, Parrish! Please never turn it on me!

  12. This really, REALLY bothers me. I have the Code Geass: Suzaku and Lelouch versions, and seeing the second Suzaku volume almost made me scream in frustration. I’m kind of OCD about that. Why the heck would they change the entire spine like that? And with the novels, that’s just pure laziness. It’s so sad.

  13. This is really so fucked up and a pain in the ass..
    C’mon.. I have the Code Geass manga’s and I really don’t like the look of it.
    Volume 4 and 5 (and possibly 6) are the same as volume 3, only the color [where the volume number is on it] are a bit more red.
    /FAIL!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *